1 |
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:38:46AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> (3) Strongly consider implementing CVS ACL's (as used by BSD projects, |
3 |
> PHP and others). This allows us to move the documents and improve on |
4 |
> existing access control, such as allowing all editors and project |
5 |
> members to have access to the documentation of a project. |
6 |
|
7 |
I think it is still necessary to have a nice guideline on where certain |
8 |
documentation is stored. Paul's proposal on having user documentation in |
9 |
doc/, while developer documentation can be elsewhere (divided amongst the |
10 |
related projects) is a nice idea which I can support. |
11 |
|
12 |
The CVS ACLs can then be used to finetune permissions (which I also |
13 |
encourage, both for security reasons as for managerial reasons). |
14 |
|
15 |
By having all user documentation in doc/, translations are easily integrated. |
16 |
Development-related documentation doesn't really need translations (my |
17 |
opinion) and is therefor "safe" to reside in the project-specific structures. |
18 |
|
19 |
Wkr, |
20 |
Sven Vermeulen |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. |
25 |
(oo) Sven Vermeulen |
26 |
(__) http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Documentation Project |