Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:03:51
Message-Id: 20090708000341.26adbbe3@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone? by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:51:05 +0000
5 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote:
6 > As Denis has already stated we're not interested in the disputes
7 > between you, paludis, exherbo and some other users or projects
8 > (funtoo?). This ml is about Gentoo not about your (ciaranm, igli,
9 > trelane, etc) pet projects.
10
11 We were discussing the Gentoo PMS project, and the Council's
12 involvement therein.
13
14 > As you know very well, quite a few people would qualify your own
15 > behaviour at times like that. So this is one of those cases that you
16 > should start by looking at the mirror.
17 >
18 > <snip>
19 >
20 > We all have plenty examples of your bad behaviour, so let's not go
21 > down that route.
22
23 Please point to examples of where I've said that I want a project to
24 fail, or that I plan to oppose absolutely everything someone does
25 regardless of merit. Please also point to examples of where I've said
26 that I want anything other than what's best for Gentoo.
27
28 > Some people seem to think that the best way for Gentoo to progress as
29 > they would like, they need to ensure that you don't get to influence
30 > Gentoo as they consider your proposals compromise Gentoo's future.
31
32 Then they should address each proposal on its own merits. That isn't
33 what's being discussed, though. We're discussing a small group of
34 people whose stated aim is to disrupt anything they can associate with
35 me in any way. How is that in any way good for Gentoo's future?
36
37 > But again, we (Gentoo developers and community) are getting tired of
38 > all the "bile" flying around. Please stop with that.
39
40 Then please start by addressing the part of the email you snipped out,
41 and explain how you expect the Gentoo PMS project to operate under
42 those kinds of conditions, and why userrel hasn't stepped in when a
43 small group of users have said that they intend to sabotage a Gentoo
44 project.
45
46 - --
47 Ciaran McCreesh
48 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
49 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
50
51 iEYEARECAAYFAkpT1FEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEzhgCgyMTbi6H5Rnm1HOWZKxAGiZuN
52 Ks0AoONu3hMcnL0eKJ/4xtvmxPT3DUvg
53 =xZ0Z
54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Guys: take it to -project Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>