List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:27:02 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <email@example.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 18-09-2011 12:59, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Michał Górny <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > wrote:
> >> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks
> >> are doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files
> >> whenever necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies
> >> those files.
> >> In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat.
> > ++
> > I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being
> > spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user
> > mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some
> > basic research.
> > I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like
> > omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature.
> You mean that no Linux users, in particular anyone not running or not
> wanting to run GNOME and Fedora, shouldn't be worried about the way
> some people in the GNOME and Fedora community seem intent to impose
> their ways to everyone else? Worse, in the process seeming to want to
> convince everyone they found the panacea and that the "old unix ways"
> that have been around for 40+ years are all obsolete and that we
> should give in to "the collective"?
Could you give at least a single example instead of this 'blah blah
blah, I don't like you'? It's much easier to discuss particular cases
rather than 'they all make me feel sad'.