1 |
On 06/25/2012 06:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
2 |
> On 23/06/12 08:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
3 |
>> On 06/10/2012 11:18 AM, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 06/10/2012 05:25 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico |
6 |
>>>> <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>>>>> A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. |
8 |
>>>>> Using the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], |
9 |
>>>>> the dbus-glib dependency will be expressed with an atom such |
10 |
>>>>> as dev-libs/glib:2:= and the package manager will translate |
11 |
>>>>> that atom to dev-libs/glib:2:=2.32 at build time. So, ':' is |
12 |
>>>>> always used to distinguish SLOT deps, and ':=' is always used |
13 |
>>>>> to distinguish ABI_SLOT deps. Is that syntax good? |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> Here's a nicer syntax: no ABI_SLOT variable, and SLOT="2/2.32". |
16 |
>>>> Then you can do explicit :2/2.32 dependencies if you like, or |
17 |
>>>> :2 (which would match SLOT="2" or SLOT="2/anything"), or :2= |
18 |
>>>> (which gets rewritten to :2/2.32=) or :2*. If an ebuild does |
19 |
>>>> SLOT="2", it's treated as 2/2. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> Yes, I prefer your syntax. |
22 |
> |
23 |
>> In portage-2.1.11.1 and 2.2.0_alpha112 I’ve added support for EAPI |
24 |
>> “4-slot-abi”: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> http://blogs.gentoo.org/zmedico/2012/06/23/automatic-rebuilds-with-experimental-eapi-4-slot-abi/ |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Does |
31 |
> |
32 |
> anyone have a fork of the tree that's being converted to test |
33 |
> this new functionality? If so I'd like to sign up. |
34 |
|
35 |
That would be nice to have, but I haven't heard of anyone doing it yet. |
36 |
-- |
37 |
Thanks, |
38 |
Zac |