| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:18, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:58:56 -0700 |
| 3 |
> ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 8/2/11 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700 |
| 7 |
>> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>> >> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for |
| 9 |
>> >> www-client/chromium, but I'm not sure if eclass is the right |
| 10 |
>> >> implementation. |
| 11 |
>> > I don't think we can start drafting until we agree on one solution. |
| 12 |
>> > AFAICS there are two major ideas: |
| 13 |
>> > 1) using special USEflags for that (which I can draft if you like), |
| 14 |
>> > 2) copying DEPENDENCIES syntax from exherbo. I guess there's nothing |
| 15 |
>> > special to draft here, only to decide on how much to copy. |
| 16 |
>> > |
| 17 |
>> > First gives you compat and handles all the cases, second one either |
| 18 |
>> > doesn't handle everything or forces a completely new syntax. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better |
| 21 |
>> integration with the package manager than USE flags should result in a |
| 22 |
>> better user experience. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Are you willing to update and EAPI-bump all the eclasses? May I remind |
| 25 |
> you that most of them don't even go beyond EAPI 0? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That should be a reason to aggressively push eclass EAPI updates, not |
| 28 |
hold back on new features :) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Best regards, |
| 32 |
> Michał Górny |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Alex Alexander | wired |
| 39 |
+ Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 40 |
++ www.linuxized.com |
Archives