On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:42:29AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 08:49 Sun 08 Mar     , Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct
> > improvements:
> > 
> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pPAJXP6shYH78lCXeqRqCUQ
> 
> - I understand the reasoning for the SRC_CONFIGURE_WITH blah stuff. I 
> strongly oppose this implementation because it makes ebuilds less like 
> bash scripts that are easy to understand. Instead I suggest extending 
> use_with() and use_enable() to accept multiple sets of arguments 
> (alternately, making custom, similar functions that will take multiple 
> args). Combined with the addition of src_configure() in EAPI=2, the 
> amount of code could be a large reduction from existing versions without 
> raising the barrier to entry.

While I understand your concerns about the SRC_CONFIGURE stuff, there
are two points I'd like to make;
1) The barrier to entry is negligible. How much more difficult is it for
someone to learn what CONFIGURE_ENABLES=( 'foo foobar' ) ? I didn't find
it difficult at all(and I've used them).
2) src_configure is just one part; src_compile has uses as does
src_install. In fact, if you want to do patches, src_prepare would be in
there too. What I'm saying is that focusing on the one part(configure)
is ignoring the good part of the rest of the proposal.

Regards,
Thomas
-- 
---------
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/////////
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
---------