List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Kahle <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I agree that these new 'channel' concepts are not very compatible with
> out stable/testing tree model and security stabilizations. Every single
> stabilization (except the first) of www-client/chromium for instance is
> a security stabilization. Chromium goes stable early and with the 'it's
> a security-bug, small problems can be ingored'-hat on.
If it gets too out of hand we could always do the Debian thing and
backport patches (but for a period of weeks to months, not moths to
years). That obviously has problems of its own.
I get that if I want to be a btrfs pioneer I might have to live with
doing daily git updates or whatever. What I don't get is that a
mainstream vendor should be pushing patches every third day. And, on
linux I'd consider chromium more mainstream than chrome - especially
on Gentoo since we've decrufted it a bit.
I LIKE the contribution of linux distros, and I don't really want to
see a move towards the Windows world where I have 10 different
auto-updaters running (or worse - no auto-update and I'm just stuck
with manual checks). I also don't like every browser having its own
copy of everything from libz to webkit to sqllite.