Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:24:20
Message-Id: 201003071223.46440.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? by Sebastian Pipping
1 On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:30:55 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
2 > What I wonder now is:
3 > - Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
4
5 The security team uses (or at least has used in the past) flags on Gentoo
6 Bugzilla.
7
8 > - Can certain flag states be required when searching?
9
10 It looks like you need to use the "Advanced Searching Using Boolean Charts"
11 section on the search page - you can select "Flag", "is equal to", and type
12 the flag name/state, for example "Assigned_To?" for one of the
13 above-mentioned security flags. Note that the "normal" search fields still
14 apply, so you need to deselect all the options in the "Status" list before
15 that particular example will produce any results.
16
17 > - Can we get their current value out using ctype=rdf output
18
19 I don't think you can with the RDF, but the "XML" button on the search results
20 page includes the flags (and a whole lot of other information), so if you're
21 going to rewrite the bugday software anyway you could consider using that
22 instead, if it would give sufficient benefit. It seems that if you're
23 requesting it programmatically you'd have to do the search, get the bug IDs
24 and explicitly pass them to the XML generator, though, which makes things a
25 little more awkward.