Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Petteri R├Ąty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:08:17 -0800
On 20.2.2010 14.28, Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Since portage-2.1.7.x is stable now, with ACCEPT_LICENSE support, we
> can think about deprecating check_license [1]. This will allow us to
> avoid using PROPERTIES=interactive in cases when it is due to
> check_license alone, since anything with a license in the @EULA
> license group is automatically masked by the default
> ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" portage configuration [2].
> 
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299095
> [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302645

We could handle it like deprecating ebeep and epause. With EAPI=4 don't
define the function any more and the Portage version will be
sufficiently new to have ACCEPT_LICENSE.

Regards,
Petteri


Replies:
Re: RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license
-- Zac Medico
References:
RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: ACCEPT_LICENSE and deprecation of check_license
Previous by date:
Re: The importance of test suites
Next by date:
Last rites: x11-libs/gtk+extra


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.