Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@g.o>
|
|
From:
|
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting
|
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 02:20:24 +0200
|
|
2011-09-16 01:54:44 Brian Harring napisał(a):
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2011-09-15 09:55:08 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
> > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200
> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
> > > > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots
> > > > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse
> > > > and euse as well.
> > >
> > > Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That
> > > really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite
> > > got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and
> > > dots are legal in exheres-0
> >
> > There is no reason for Gentoo to be worse than Exherbo and not allow dots in USE flags.
>
> Seriously Arfrever, drop the rhetoric here, and go fix the profile
> compatibility issue.
I suggest to support files with "-${EAPI}" suffix.
Examples:
profiles/package.mask-5
profiles/use.desc-5
profiles/base/package.mask-5
profiles/base/package.use-5
profiles/base/package.use.force-5
profiles/base/package.use.mask-5
profiles/base/use.force-5
profiles/base/use.mask-5
profiles/desc/python_abis.desc-5
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|