1 |
I think what the original poster is looking for is the ability for it to |
2 |
fetch in the background and compile in the foreground. Time to compile |
3 |
meta-packages like KDE might be reduced significantly, especially on |
4 |
bandwidth challenged systems. Basically, the fetch should be performed on a |
5 |
separate thread than the build. |
6 |
|
7 |
Tom Veldhouse |
8 |
|
9 |
----- Original Message ----- |
10 |
From: "Christian Skarby" <christian.skarby@×××××××××.no> |
11 |
To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
12 |
Cc: <mz269@××××××××.hu> |
13 |
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:11 AM |
14 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage suggestion |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
> I belive it could be achieved by doing this: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> emerge --fetchonly A B && emerge A B |
20 |
> or |
21 |
> emerge -f A B && emerge A B |
22 |
> for short |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Even though it would be nice to have a flag like --fetchfirst (so that one |
25 |
> do not need to list the ebuilds twice, I still think the portage-system |
26 |
> will have to go through it twice.) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> BTW what is the id-bug-number of your bug? |
29 |
> (I believe that it would be nice if we post that as a reference in |
30 |
> situations like this.) |
31 |
> |
32 |
> All the best, |
33 |
> Christian |
34 |
> |
35 |
> > Hi! |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Dan Naumov wrote: |
38 |
> >> Submit this suggestion to Gentoo BugZilla. |
39 |
> > OK, I did. How long time can it take to develop and commit such a |
40 |
> > feature to the main portage tree? |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Zizi |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
46 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
47 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
48 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> _______________________________________________ |
53 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
54 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
55 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
56 |
> |