| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 14:10, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 11:08:12AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The problem would be to support multiple version of the same ebuild. And |
| 4 |
> > what to think of different packages wanting different, but similarly |
| 5 |
> > named, source files. I think a file renaming scheme might be the best way |
| 6 |
> > to handle the problems. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Perhaps this is a discussion for later (when 1.4 is out), since it involves |
| 9 |
> significant changes to solve problems which don't occur frequently. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Of course. It is not really a problem right now, and I know that there are |
| 12 |
other problems concerning portage that are more urgent (I think so too). So |
| 13 |
my standpoint is that when the tarbal is not versioned, and redistribution is |
| 14 |
not allowed (so RESTRICT=nomirror should be set in the ebuild), the package |
| 15 |
(and its requestor) is just out of luck. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Researcher |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv |
Archives