Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:19:18 -0400
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
>> It appears that devs will have to add the remote for the live
>> repository after they've cloned the bundle - otherwise they'll just
>> keep pulling from the bundle which isn't all that convenient.
>
> I think you still misunderstand. As I understand Robin, we wouldn't
> even offer up a clone of the full-history bundle, it would only be
> offered as a normal download. The default workflow is cloning from the
> shallow version, which will obviously give you the desired remote.

I wasn't talking about full-history.

I was talking about the fact that we're distributing a bundle.  If you
clone a bundle, you won't have a remote for the live repository.  You
would need to add it, unless you plan to never push a commit back to
the gentoo repository, and you plan to manually download bundles
anytime you want to update your local repository.

I'm not sure how exactly Robin was planning on making the full history
available, but it sounded like it would also be distributed as a
bundle.  That means that you can certainly clone it - just type git
clone path-to-locally-saved-bundle-file .  If it is in some other
format like a pack file then you would import it into a repository via
a different command.

Rich


References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.