| 1 |
2009-08-22 00:51:14 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:04 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I would like to also notice that (not yet approved by Council) |
| 5 |
> > definition of nonfatal() in PMS was recently drastically changed |
| 6 |
> > without proper discussion with developers of other package managers. |
| 7 |
> > [1] was sent about 20 minutes after discussion about nonfatal() |
| 8 |
> > started in #gentoo-portage in about 2009-08-06 19:45 UTC. (I'm |
| 9 |
> > attaching IRC log from #gentoo-portage (in UTC+02 timezone).) I think |
| 10 |
> > that such drastic changes should be first discussed on gentoo-dev |
| 11 |
> > mailing list. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> There was no change to the definition of nonfatal. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
There was a change regardless of what you think. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> There was a clarification of the wording after it became clear that there |
| 18 |
> was room to misinterpret the intent of the original wording, and it went |
| 19 |
> through the usual Council-mandated process for such a change. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This sentence contradicts your first sentence. Additionally you had deceived |
| 22 |
Christian Faulhammer by not presenting negative consequences of your patch and |
| 23 |
your interpretation of original wording of definition of nonfatal(). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives