Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nathan Phillip Brink <binki@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:55:23
Message-Id: 20120312175416.GA28677@ohnopublishing.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies by Matthew Summers
1 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Matthew Summers wrote:
2 > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3 > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (12 Mar 2012)
4 > > # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059,
5 > > # #372839, #380155, #380627, #381055, #383515, #383553, #384687,
6 > > # and #403399. Search bugzilla with keyword lilypond. Nothing
7 > > # left in tree that builds. Removal in 30 days.
8 > > <media-sound/lilypond-2.12.4
9 > > media-sound/denemo
10 > > media-sound/frescobaldi
11 > >
12 > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (12 Mar 2012)
13 > > # media-sound/lilypond required for this is masked in ../package.mask
14 > > # for removal
15 > > app-text/asciidoc test
16 > >
17 >
18 > Just curious, but is there no one interested in this, lilypond,
19 > package anymore? The latest stable is 2.14.2 and the project is pretty
20 > active. Seems like a shame to get rid of it entirely.
21
22 I myself am quite interested in lilypond. I only use it occasionally
23 and am still a novice at it, but I like the typesetting it does.
24
25 Maybe next week I can find time to attack some of these bugs and
26 rescue it, unless if someone more qualified or with more time is
27 interested...
28
29 --
30 binki
31
32 Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o>