Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: council <council@g.o>, qa@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:31:23
Message-Id: 20110131023123.GB29236@comet
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 On 22:11 Fri 28 Jan , Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Hi,
6 > first off i would like to apologize for not sending this mail sooner
7 > (helluva week).
8 >
9 > So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
10 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
11 >
12 > Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the whole document
13 > so it gets accepted :)
14
15 I think the question of whether a lead's decision can be revoked by a
16 majority vote of the team should be a global Gentoo policy and not
17 team-specific. I personally disagree that it should be possible, but
18 that is a separate decision from whether it should be a common process
19 across all of Gentoo.
20
21 --
22 Thanks,
23 Donnie
24
25 Donnie Berkholz
26 Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux
27 Blog: http://dberkholz.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>