| 1 |
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:46:59PM +0200, Dominik Kapusta wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello guys! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The qt4-r2 eclass is meant to help with ebuilds for Qt-based (qmake-based, to |
| 7 |
> be precise) applications. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Haven't look at the content yet. But the name is going to make things extremely |
| 11 |
confusing. I can see people using qt4-r2 just because it has -r2 (so it is newer |
| 12 |
than qt4), even if they should use qt4. If you really need to introduce a new |
| 13 |
eclass, you should use a name that accurately reflects what it does. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers, |
| 16 |
Thomas |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
--------- |
| 19 |
Thomas Anderson |
| 20 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 21 |
///////// |
| 22 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 23 |
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council |
| 24 |
--------- |
Archives