1 |
Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> Shouldn't all licenses listed at <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/> |
3 |
> (unless marked as non-free) be added to FSF-APPROVED? These would be |
4 |
> the following: |
5 |
|
6 |
Great idea, that would remove a lot of hassle. |
7 |
|
8 |
Also, I was wondering about LGPL-2 and GPL-1, surely they're |
9 |
GPL-compatible? The suggested license header in |
10 |
/usr/portage/licenses/GPL-1 contains "either version 1, or (at your |
11 |
option) any later version." The LGPL-2 suggests 2 or later also. It's |
12 |
strange that the FSF doesn't mention them. |
13 |
|
14 |
Either way, the groups should definitely be expanded. |