Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:14:33 +0200
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Fact: the underlying issue is a libtool bug.

Wrong, it isn't just that, --as-needed and libtool are unrelated.

> Fact: as-needed does not fix this bug. It attempts to work around it.

Wrong, --as-needed does exactly what is supposed to do, precise bookkeeping.

> Fact: as-needed breaks standard-compliant code.

Wrong, --as-needed breaks disputable code that happens to be 
standard-compliant by a specific read of the standard. The fact the 
specific code is something wrong from the security/style/maintainability 
point makes it a bonus.

> Fact: fixing the libtool bug would give all the benefits purportedly
> given by using as-needed, without the drawbacks.

Wrong, fixing libtool gives other benefits, so it's worth trying to fix 
it as well. The new autotools and proper usage of them makes life easier 
so it's worth improving on this side.

> It's quite simple,

Probably but is an empty sentence w/out supporting code.

> and if there're any of the above that you didn't
> already know then why are you wasting everyone else's time discussing
> things in this thread without doing some basic research first?

Basically most people is discussing with you since thinks, wrongly, that 
could be possible take something good from this discussion. The patch 
you pointed doesn't look complete nor acceptable to upstream as is, yet 
could help.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- David Leverton
References:
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Luca Barbato
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Luca Barbato
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Brian Harring
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Previous by date:
Re: packages up for grabs
Next by date:
Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.