1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 04/05/12 11:35, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
5 |
> On 5/4/12 8:02 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: |
6 |
>> I consider dbus still not reliable for core services. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Just curious - why? I just have no idea about how dbus works or what are |
9 |
> possible problems with it. |
10 |
|
11 |
About all the integrations I know of crash if the daemon crashes and the |
12 |
daemon itself tended to be frail. I hadn't checked lately if it improved |
13 |
since all my usage for it is limited. |
14 |
|
15 |
Anyway for core services I'm sold to the principle of the least |
16 |
complexity and maximum separation, so that replacing/updating dbus won't |
17 |
force me to reboot my system. |
18 |
|
19 |
lu |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
- -- |
23 |
|
24 |
Luca Barbato |
25 |
Gentoo/linux |
26 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
27 |
|
28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
31 |
|
32 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk+kK4MACgkQ6Ex4woTpDjQKkACfWepG+ppIl/uapi9JjMlsF0fh |
33 |
8IAAoIvzZ1kq0dJNo8q+kyXVayEZRTNM |
34 |
=LST6 |
35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |