Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Chad M. Huneycutt" <chad.huneycutt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-user@g.o, gentoo-newbie@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Reply-To Munging
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 11:31:08
Message-Id: 3CEFBC4C.5060009@acm.org
1 It looks like the decision on whether or not to stop reply-to munging has
2 fallen to me. After a little debate, I have decided to leave the mailing
3 lists as they are.
4
5 First, I would ask that everyone read the excellent articles at the
6 following URLs:
7
8 http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
9 http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
10
11 They pretty well cover the pros & cons of reply-to munging. I find the
12 latter article much more compelling, but maybe that is b/c I like the
13 system how it is already. I would like to add one more point. I personally
14 do not use the "group reply" function on MUA's unless I really need to. I
15 don't want to even risk getting into the habit of hitting that and
16 accidentally mass-mailing a personal mail. You might notice that this is
17 very similar to an argument made in the first article above. My response
18 is that it is very unlikely that I will be mailing information of a
19 personal nature in response to a mailing list posting.
20
21 For those that want people to use a different address than their From:
22 address, I suggest you put it in your signature.
23
24 Feel free to respond to this, and if I feel that an overwhelming number of
25 you really would prefer to do away with Reply-to munging, then I will do it.
26
27 One other thing that I will consider. If a particular mailing list feels
28 that reply-to munging is not necessarily, we could remove it just for that
29 group.
30
31
32 Chad Huneycutt (chadh@g.o)