Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:05:31
Message-Id: pan.2009.10.07.13.59.05@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test by Patrick Lauer
1 Patrick Lauer posted on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:36:47 +0200 as excerpted:
2
3 >> Now I see this proposal for making it a USE flag, which may or may not
4 >> be more appropriate, I don't know. I do know I'd love to see someone
5 >> explain the differences.
6 > It's a bit more selective. RESTRICT is a global "no, this is broken",
7 > the new useflag (or more fine-grained restrict?) says "there are tests,
8 > but they might make things explode" so that those that do want the tests
9 > can easily use them without making users sad puppied. And if there's
10 > anything we don't want it is more sad puppies.
11
12 Thanks. That makes things /much/ clearer! =:^)
13
14 --
15 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
16 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
17 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman