Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets?
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:06:30
Message-Id: 20110626080257.12d523ef@googlemail.com
1 Here's a completely different way of doing tags:
2
3 First, standardise sets. We probably want to go with a format along the
4 lines of:
5
6 eapi = 4
7 description = Monkeys
8
9 dev-monkey/howler
10 dev-monkey/spider
11 >=dev-monkey/spanky-2.0
12 dev-monkey/squirrel
13
14 where eapi has to be on the first line.
15
16 Second, make a bunch of sets named kde-tag, editors-tag, xml-tag,
17 monkeys-tag etc.
18
19 Third, make tools that allow browsing, searching etc able to list
20 things by tag (or sets in general).
21
22 Advantages: dead easy to implement, backwards compatible, we need sets
23 anyway.
24
25 Disadvantages: doesn't use some horribly convoluted system of XML,
26 wikis and web 2.0.
27
28 --
29 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Are tags just sets? Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>