From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? |
Date: | Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:06:30 |
Message-Id: | 20110626080257.12d523ef@googlemail.com |
1 | Here's a completely different way of doing tags: |
2 | |
3 | First, standardise sets. We probably want to go with a format along the |
4 | lines of: |
5 | |
6 | eapi = 4 |
7 | description = Monkeys |
8 | |
9 | dev-monkey/howler |
10 | dev-monkey/spider |
11 | >=dev-monkey/spanky-2.0 |
12 | dev-monkey/squirrel |
13 | |
14 | where eapi has to be on the first line. |
15 | |
16 | Second, make a bunch of sets named kde-tag, editors-tag, xml-tag, |
17 | monkeys-tag etc. |
18 | |
19 | Third, make tools that allow browsing, searching etc able to list |
20 | things by tag (or sets in general). |
21 | |
22 | Advantages: dead easy to implement, backwards compatible, we need sets |
23 | anyway. |
24 | |
25 | Disadvantages: doesn't use some horribly convoluted system of XML, |
26 | wikis and web 2.0. |
27 | |
28 | -- |
29 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? | Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Are tags just sets? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |