Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@g.o>
Subject: Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:03:51 +0100
On 04/03/10 10:50, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21
> 
> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says:
> "We will not hide problems"

Sounds good, can we at the same time get RESOLVED OBSOLETE (for bugs that are
not valid anymore due to changed situation, RESOLVED INVALID isn't applicable in
this case as it implies the bug is and was invalid from the begining).

When we kill RESOLVED LATER maybe we could also kill RESOLVED REMIND? I don't
remember it being very useful.

-- 
Krzysztof Pawlik  <nelchael at gentoo.org>  key id: 0xF6A80E46
desktop-misc, java, apache, ppc, vim, kernel, python...

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Previous by date:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by date:
Re: Is Gentoo dying?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.