| 1 |
On Thursday 12 April 2012 15:53:07 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> There is consensus in the gentoo-pms mailing list that we should |
| 3 |
> tighten the rules for the position of the EAPI assignment in ebuilds, |
| 4 |
> namely that it should take place in the first non-blank and |
| 5 |
> non-comment line. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The devmanual already requires that "if you want to override the EAPI |
| 8 |
> variable, you have to specify it at the top of the ebuild." |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In any case, the portage tree mostly complies with this. There are 130 |
| 11 |
> ebuilds in 66 packages (or 0.4 % of the total number) that don't, but |
| 12 |
> they can be trivially fixed (and I volunteer to do the work). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
do it |
| 15 |
-mike |
Archives