| 1 |
Michał Górny schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:47:38 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> 2. switching from udev to mdev (avoids required /usr of udev) |
| 6 |
>> 3. some wrapper script to mount /usr before udev starts |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> These two should be really discouraged as a cheap, temporary solution. |
| 9 |
> We should not support hate-admining. I personally think that busybox is |
| 10 |
> ready to go into /usr even earlier than udev. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Please give us a bit more than just your opinion. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Why do you see mdev as a temporary solution? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And this part was not about the movement to /usr at all, so why do you |
| 17 |
suggest another movement here? And while you answer that, please also |
| 18 |
tell us, why you want to migrate packages to a different install |
| 19 |
location without a need. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>> For the idea of complete migration to /usr, i see no reason to go this |
| 23 |
>> route in advance. Just keep with our default install locations and |
| 24 |
>> follow upstream, if and where needed. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> What about upstreams who do not care? In other words, all those |
| 27 |
> packages which we hack to install into rootfs? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
They install and work fine, so just keep it this way. I did not see any |
| 30 |
argument to move packages around, that work well and have no issue with |
| 31 |
their current install location. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives