Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Kevin Lacquement <klac@...>
Subject: Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:08:30 -0500
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:12:41AM +0200, dams@... wrote:

<snip>
> 
> FHS is made so that f*cking proprietary application get well installed on every
> distribution, so that they can sell more, and make the big linux actors (IBM
> and co), more rich.
> 
> If you agree with this way to let linux go forward (I have no opinion on that),
> then be FHS compliant. It's certain that being FHS compliant is a plus when
> dealing with proprietary software companies.

Of course, to make proprietary apps happy, Gentoo would also need to be
LSB-compliant.  And _that_ requires supporting RPMs, which I don't think we
want to do (see the GWN from April 1).

Cheers,
Kevin

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Sven Vermeulen
References:
gentoo vs. the FHS
-- aeriksson
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Stanislav Brabec
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Caleb Tennis
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- dams
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Next by thread:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Previous by date:
ebuild help
Next by date:
Re: Re: Enemy Territory and Gentoo


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.