Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:28:35
Message-Id: 200609071325.43689@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers by Carsten Lohrke
1 On Thursday 07 September 2006 04:09, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
2 > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
3 I'll try to overlook the reverted changes in kdelibs for bug fixes, the
4 improper ${ROOT} injected in my changes where it wasn't supposed to be, the
5 broken opengl on kdelibs checks that appeared last month, unhelpful comments
6 when trying to achieve something from the users, a bug lingering for an year
7 and a half because my solution wasn't good enough, and that was the solution
8 that now kde 3.5.4 implements, decisions against the interest and request of
9 all the users and developers, QA bugs opened without checking facts, GWN
10 articles sent without notes on kde@g.o alias for what I can see ...
11
12 No, I'm not referring to Stefan. He's human and he did mistakes, but if
13 someone would be allowed to put them in public, that would be his lead (that
14 in this case is Caleb, not you), or the QA team.
15
16 --
17 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
18 Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

Replies