| 1 |
>From my experience so far with gentoo... I have a feedback. |
| 2 |
A couple of times I wished the categories were more specific, Once I was |
| 3 |
looking for a juke box.. I wished I could search for all the sw simlar |
| 4 |
to xmms. And the other time it was sound editing rosegarden like |
| 5 |
software. Most of the time I am just curious how many varieties in a |
| 6 |
perticular app category are available... a catagory like gams could |
| 7 |
definately use it. |
| 8 |
Hope this helpls |
| 9 |
Spundun |
| 10 |
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 11:31, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: |
| 11 |
> On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 19:12, Vadim wrote: |
| 12 |
> > I think that Gentoo needs some better way of describing packages. For example, |
| 13 |
> > I think it would also be a good idea to add longer descriptions, like those |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It's a nice idea. On the theme of metadata that runs throughout the |
| 16 |
> entire distribution however there is a common argument against it. The |
| 17 |
> current information points the user to the package homepage which is |
| 18 |
> considered as the most uptodate and proficient resource of that |
| 19 |
> information. This also prevents information duplication and the need to |
| 20 |
> maintain it. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives