Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>
Subject: Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:28:45 +0200
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Lukasz Damentko <rane@g.o> said:
> > 1. I'd like to ask Council to discuss possible reactions to our [...]

> Due to their privacy policy I don't think we'll ever be able to get
> adequate explanations from Freenode staff when our devs are banned.

I think that's a limitation which will also applies to other IRC
networks, therefore we have to live with that limitation or run our own
IRC network. I can't say that I prefer the latter one ... we're a quite
good in running our distribution - but would we be also that good in
running our own IRC network? I guess not ...

> > 2. I want Council to consider moving their meetings somewhere where [...]

> If for some reason a developer was unable to attend a meeting due to
> being klined or the internet being FUBAR'd, I know that I have my IM
> details available in LDAP for that dev to be able to contact me, or they
> could send the entire council an email. I don't think setting up our own
> IRC server is worth the trouble for this small purpose.

+1 on that

> > 3. I want Council to consider creating and using irc.gentoo.org [...]

> I like this idea.

again +1 on that

> spb rose some concerns in the meeting with regards to
> some users thinking that if they came onto irc.gentoo.org and joined #java
> that it would be a Gentoo java channel, but it doesn't seem like
> Freenode considers this to be much of a problem.  For evidence of this:
> http://freenode.net/acknowledgements.shtml
> 
> They thank projects for pointing their domains to them, so I believe
> that the network as a whole shouldn't have a problem with this.  If
> someone thinks I'm misunderstanding what they mean on that page, please
> let me know.

Given the fact that the concern spb raised in the meeting is a
non-problem, at least until Freenode changes its policy in that aspect,
i see no problem with pointing irc.g.o to irc.freenode.net. Plus
irc.g.o. in some way points to Freenode servers already

irc.gentoo.org	canonical name = irc.osuosl.org.

irc.osuosl.org is an A record for 140.211.166.3 and 140.211.166.4 which
are both Freenode boxes.

  Tobias
Attachment:
signature.asc (Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil)
References:
Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
-- Lukasz Damentko
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
-- Mark Loeser
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
Next by thread:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
Previous by date:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
Next by date:
Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.