Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:00:52
Message-Id: 4E94A053.5020605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild by Fabian Groffen
1 On 10/11/2011 10:49 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 11-10-2011 22:38:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
3 >> This document should be fixed. Any comments about the patches belong to
4 >> header of those patches, available for possible upstreams as well.
5 >> Doesn't belong to ebuilds.
6 >
7 > The devmanual doesn't suggest this is the way to go, does it?
8
9 No, but it should. See below.
10
11 >> So it very rarely makes sense to call epatch multiple times, and
12 >> certainly doesn't improve maintainability.
13 >
14 > Conclusion doesn't follow from argumentation.
15 >
16 >
17
18 http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/clean-patches
19
20 Look for "here's a check list of things to keep in the patch header:"

Replies