From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | ||
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:56:41 | ||
Message-Id: | 4F60E9C1.7050600@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! by Maxim Kammerer |
1 | On 03/14/2012 11:36 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: |
2 | > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:58, Matthew Summers |
3 | > <quantumsummers@g.o> wrote: |
4 | >> Why is an in-kernel initramfs so bad anyway? I am baffled. Its quite |
5 | >> nice to have a minimal recovery env in case mounting fails, etc, etc, |
6 | >> etc. |
7 | > |
8 | > There is nothing bad about initramfs. I think that you are misreading |
9 | > the arguments above. |
10 | |
11 | Whatever the arguments may be, the whole discussion boils down to the |
12 | fact that the only people who seem to have a "problem" are those that |
13 | have a separate /usr partition and simultaneously refuse to use an |
14 | initramfs. |
15 | -- |
16 | Thanks, |
17 | Zac |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem! | Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> |