Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pat Double <double@×××××××××.com>
To: Nick Jones <carpaski@××××××.net>, Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.47-r6 and distcc
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:42:43
Message-Id: 200302280530.20362.double@inebraska.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.47-r6 and distcc by Nick Jones
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I am using portage-2.0.47-r7 and the latest distcc in ~x86 and it still does
5 not work. Are there specific ebuilds that disable distcc? I tried updating
6 distcc, ccache and parted as tests. No distcc prepended to gcc.
7
8 On Friday 28 February 2003 01:51 am, Nick Jones wrote:
9 > > Seems like the distcc feature stopped working since I upgraded to the
10 > > latest portage. Can anyone confirm?
11 > >
12 > > gcc is being called directly from the installed path instead of the
13 > > wrapper directory generated by distcc. it looks like portage isn't
14 > > setting the PATH to include /usr/lib/distcc/bin as the first item. This
15 > > worked fine in portage-2.0.47-r3 but not -r5 or -r6.
16 >
17 > use >=portage-2.0.47-r7
18 >
19 > --
20 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
21
22 - --
23 Pat Double, double@×××××××××.com
24 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
27
28 iD8DBQE+X0hMdOmLNuoWoKgRArh3AJ43NYzP4LF01SFzkjS2oNxieeDDPwCcDtf6
29 koy4XIkE0FsHUwiUdH4TTHU=
30 =6HR7
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list