Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:44:20
Message-Id: 1307547818.15732.4.camel@graaff.xs4all.nl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2
3 > The value of S that is assigned in global scope (i.e. the one
4 > containing the wildcard) violates it.
5
6 Ah, right, I initially read Donnie's quotation from PMS as an
7 endorsement for our approach, but that is only true for our EAPI=4
8 solution where we only change S within a function.
9
10 That leaves the question what to do with the approach for EAPI=2,3. I'd
11 rather not risk breaking ebuilds by removing this support just for a
12 violation of PMS if there is no real problem exposed by it.
13
14 Kind regards,
15
16 Hans

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>