1 |
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:38:31 -0400 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Is there something in particular that is causing alarm with systemd? |
5 |
> All I've seen is a package in the tree and some discussion. I'm sure |
6 |
> there will be requests for various packages to install some files |
7 |
> needed for integrations/etc. If anything is traumatic I'd be |
8 |
> specific in stating concerns so that the root cause can be addressed. |
9 |
|
10 |
No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks are |
11 |
doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files whenever |
12 |
necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies those files. |
13 |
|
14 |
In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Best regards, |
18 |
Michał Górny |