| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> What we could do in gentoo is to make a gentoo-soruces-workstation and a |
| 5 |
> gentoo-sources-server, so we can get a kernel that fit the workstation use |
| 6 |
> and a kernel optimized for raw speed. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Hmm, even the 'gentoo-sources-workstation' would be not my favorite. I really |
| 9 |
wonder why this patch-stuffed kernel is offered ? It is slow, buggy, barely |
| 10 |
compiles if you switch off a set of options you dont want (low latency for |
| 11 |
instance or preemtable kernel) and there is simply no performance boost. On |
| 12 |
the contrary the thing is plain slow. There is also no 'snappiness' boost I |
| 13 |
noticed, so why ??? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If it would be an experiment to offer a better kernel, ok, but then some |
| 16 |
conclusions ought to be taken. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- -- |
| 19 |
Werner,- |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQE+lSRcxiU3uL/NdUYRAoooAJ9uyhyYdb+93xkSIh4HJcPMD8lnaACeJlPy |
| 24 |
lw5DVcfWnQ6tZSN5N/fAd7U= |
| 25 |
=Mdsh |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives