Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
From: Richard Yao <ryao@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:27:07 -0400
On 03/14/12 18:49, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:39:05PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
>> With that said, I have a few questions:
>>
>> 1. Why does no one mention the enterprise use case at all?
> 
> It has been pointed out before, why constantly repeat ourselves.

Simple. No one has documented it. A webpage that makes a few vague
references to "enterprise use" does not count as documentation.

I happened to figure it out when trying to rationalize why anyone would
want this, but this is hardly obvious to those that imagine a computer
as a self-sufficient single disk system.

>> 2. Why not make rootfs a NFS mount with a unionfs at the SAN/NAS device?
> 
> unionfs is still a "work in progress", some systems can't do that yet.

That sounds like something that needs to be fixed.

>> 3. Why not let the users choose where these directories go and support
>> both locations?
> 
> Because a plethera of options is a sure way to make sure that half of
> them don't work over the long run.
> 
> We aren't Debian here people, we don't support "everything" :)

Gentoo provides far more options than Debian does, so this seems
somewhat contradictory to me.


> If you want to support both, great, feel free to step up and do the
> work.

Fair enough, however, I should remind you that not much will happen
without a decision from the Gentoo Council. I am willing to accept
whatever decision they make, but I think that exposing this decision to
users is something that is within our ability to do.

Portage provides use with the ability to do abstractions that other
distributions cannot do, such as permitting people to merge
/usr{bin,lib{32,64,},sbin} into /.

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Joshua Kinard
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Greg KH
References:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Greg KH
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Maxim Kammerer
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Matthew Summers
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Maxim Kammerer
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Zac Medico
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- David Leverton
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Greg KH
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Richard Yao
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
-- Greg KH
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!
Next by date:
Re: Re: Let's redesign the entire filesystem!


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.