| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:26:46PM +0200, Tommmmm Chvvvtal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> since I am this meetings girl for everything here is first pass on our |
| 4 |
> agenda. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I am adding this mail only to g-dev and g-dev-announce to see if |
| 7 |
> everyone notice, sorry if it slip your radar. Also if you have something |
| 8 |
> to say on this mail please reply to gentoo-dev, or you will render me |
| 9 |
> quite sad about thread breaking. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Without much ado here goes THE PLAN: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 1) allow all members to show up (5 min) |
| 14 |
> 2) voting |
| 15 |
> 2a) we have nothing to vote this time, nobody wanted anything YAY :) |
| 16 |
> 3) discussion |
| 17 |
> 3a) from last council meeting: the mailing list situation |
| 18 |
> 3b) from last council meeting: eclass API changes |
| 19 |
> 3c) EAPI 4 status (jmbsvicetto nominate this so we actualy do something new) |
| 20 |
> 4) Bugs assigned to council@ in bugzilla and their progress |
| 21 |
> 5) select the chair for following meeting |
| 22 |
> 6) open floor: community/developers can smash us here :) |
| 23 |
> Z) buy some cookies (30 min) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I suspect we may not wind up being able to get to it in the coming |
| 26 |
meeting, but I'd like g55 sorted. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Specifically, if the authors of it (cc'd) want it to move forward, |
| 29 |
request the council vote on it. If you don't want it voted on, mark |
| 30 |
it moribund. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
The purpose behind this is to put to end this discussion rather than |
| 33 |
having it flare up and make a mess every few months. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Simply put, it's nothing but divisive noise at this point with no real |
| 36 |
new technical discourse occuring- meaning it's realistically time for |
| 37 |
a decision (either push it to a vote or put it to bed). |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
~harring |
Archives