1 |
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:26:46PM +0200, Tommmmm Chvvvtal wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> since I am this meetings girl for everything here is first pass on our |
4 |
> agenda. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I am adding this mail only to g-dev and g-dev-announce to see if |
7 |
> everyone notice, sorry if it slip your radar. Also if you have something |
8 |
> to say on this mail please reply to gentoo-dev, or you will render me |
9 |
> quite sad about thread breaking. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Without much ado here goes THE PLAN: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 1) allow all members to show up (5 min) |
14 |
> 2) voting |
15 |
> 2a) we have nothing to vote this time, nobody wanted anything YAY :) |
16 |
> 3) discussion |
17 |
> 3a) from last council meeting: the mailing list situation |
18 |
> 3b) from last council meeting: eclass API changes |
19 |
> 3c) EAPI 4 status (jmbsvicetto nominate this so we actualy do something new) |
20 |
> 4) Bugs assigned to council@ in bugzilla and their progress |
21 |
> 5) select the chair for following meeting |
22 |
> 6) open floor: community/developers can smash us here :) |
23 |
> Z) buy some cookies (30 min) |
24 |
|
25 |
I suspect we may not wind up being able to get to it in the coming |
26 |
meeting, but I'd like g55 sorted. |
27 |
|
28 |
Specifically, if the authors of it (cc'd) want it to move forward, |
29 |
request the council vote on it. If you don't want it voted on, mark |
30 |
it moribund. |
31 |
|
32 |
The purpose behind this is to put to end this discussion rather than |
33 |
having it flare up and make a mess every few months. |
34 |
|
35 |
Simply put, it's nothing but divisive noise at this point with no real |
36 |
new technical discourse occuring- meaning it's realistically time for |
37 |
a decision (either push it to a vote or put it to bed). |
38 |
|
39 |
~harring |