| 1 |
* Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> [04/09/18 14:27 -0400]: |
| 2 |
> How are we going to handle the other arches. |
| 3 |
> ppc/ppc64 These two arches could be added to mix relatively easy. But |
| 4 |
> **** we can't even get one of those teams to test simple kernel patches |
| 5 |
> that were developed especially for them after multiple requests. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Half a year ago the ppc-team was in quite the same |
| 8 |
situation. Small development-team, a lot of bugs, many |
| 9 |
small annoying mistakes in the documentation etc. pp. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The whole team did a hard work, so that we know can handle a |
| 12 |
lot of our bugs in a short time, roll up our old ones, and |
| 13 |
we are already in progress for the 2004.3 release (this time |
| 14 |
ppc will become a member of the release-game :-) ). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If things go on like now, it should be possible that the ppc |
| 17 |
team could offer some time and CPU-power for a hardened |
| 18 |
release on that platform. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Keep cool and don't hesitate. Even Rome has not been built |
| 21 |
on one day... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, Lars |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
PS: I wish that hardened-gentoo would not 'die'. It's a |
| 26 |
really nice experiment for securing a Linux. |
Archives