1 |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
2 |
> 2011-09-15 09:55:08 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
3 |
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 |
4 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
6 |
> > > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse |
7 |
> > > and euse as well. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That |
10 |
> > really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite |
11 |
> > got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and |
12 |
> > dots are legal in exheres-0 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> There is no reason for Gentoo to be worse than Exherbo and not allow dots in USE flags. |
15 |
|
16 |
Seriously Arfrever, drop the rhetoric here, and go fix the profile |
17 |
compatibility issue. Everytime you bring up dot's in use, you ignore |
18 |
compatibility, and every damn time it gets brought up I keep having |
19 |
to repeat this. It's not productive and this has repeated for at |
20 |
least a year now. |
21 |
|
22 |
People who want this need to sort the compat issue rather than |
23 |
sticking their heads in the sand. |
24 |
|
25 |
~brian |