Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:51:34
Message-Id: 20091104135038.098c7ef4@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations by Ben de Groot
1 Hi,
2
3 Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>:
4
5 > What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization,
6 > even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team
7 > feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that
8 > can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status.
9
10 I surely subscribe to that. At the moment Brent (ranger) is
11 definitely alone on that arch.
12
13 V-Li
14
15 --
16 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
17 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
18
19 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o>