Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 02:26:33
Message-Id: 20120513022441.GB1358@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:59:22AM +0000, Duncan wrote
2
3 > It may very well be that a fork is thus required. I guess we wait and
4 > see. But I don't see the kde folks being willingly subsumed into a
5 > gnomeos black hole, and time and again, floss history has demonstrated
6 > that when there's an immediate need, forks do occur. Both gnome and kde
7 > have their forks in recent history, xorg is a fork, there's the glibc and
8 > gcc history, etc. If integration gets too close, a fork /will/ happen.
9
10 There already is a lightweight udev implementation ("mdev") included
11 in busybox. Given busybox's philisophy and goals, we can be certain
12 that mdev will remain lightweight. I'm not a programmer or developer,
13 but I was annoyed enough to start what became
14 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev BTW, there is a sort of "udev rules"
15 equivalant. See http://git.busybox.net/busybox/plain/docs/mdev.txt
16
17 --
18 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>