Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:02:24 +0200
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:40:02 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:

> d) Talk with github folks to add our repo as 'mirror'.

Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please.

Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works
just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but how many places is a
developer supposed to monitor?
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michał Górny
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dan Douglas
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Kent Fredric
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: anybody interested in writing a Perl ebuild?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.