From: | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 15:03:41 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120524170224.728c194e@sera-17.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Michał Górny" |
1 | On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:40:02 +0200 |
2 | Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > d) Talk with github folks to add our repo as 'mirror'. |
5 | |
6 | Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please. |
7 | |
8 | Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works |
9 | just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but how many places is a |
10 | developer supposed to monitor? |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |