Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 04:04:02 +0000
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:52:42PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote:
> > Cloning the repo [1] takes 200seconds on 8cores (it's 2GB of data and
> > 22 minutes of 3.4GHz cpus).
> As others have pointed out, probably the best way to bootstrap this is
> to offer tarballs of a shallow repository and a full repository.
> Perhaps we'd offer the latter as a torrent.  The shallow repository
> should be light on the CPU too.
no.

i explicitly said before, there would be two repos:
1. main working repo, starts with ONLY initial commit. 40MB pack.
2. historical. read-only, you graft it to history to use.

BOTH of these would have preferred download via git-bundle over
HTTP/rsync. historical would NOT be available via clone due to cputime
hit.

please look up git-bundle before suggesting things like tarballs of
repos/checkouts.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robbat2@g.o
GnuPG FP   : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Aaron W. Swenson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass
Next by date:
Re: multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.