List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:01:24PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:50:49 +0200
> Paul de Vrieze <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Maybe they should be marked RESTRICT="nomirror"
> But they would still be dependencies in that case. Maybe a "non-free"
> USE flag could be useful for such situations.
Ugh, this was one of the reasons I moved away from debian. Too much
time spent on political issues and trying to be political correct and
'pure'. I like the gentoo way of giving me the programs I need here
and now. With debian there was always a bunch of unoffical dpkg sites
which had to reside in sources.list to get some files which were
deemed 'unappropiate' for the offical Debian.
Moving down the path of free/non-free will soon make you end up on the
road of insanity. Who's to decide what's non-free and not? Perhaps an
easy way to dump the LICENSE field in the ebuild you're about to
install, but adding a USE flag for it seems to overdo a non-issue I
To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic.
email@example.com mailing list