List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:29:28 PM Michael Weber wrote:
> On 05/20/2012 07:22 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> > I'd put money on there not being a single admin who has ever used
> > the games group to control access to games. Games really have no
> > business being on a system where anything like that is a
> > requirement to begin with.
> We (students council) use pam_ldap for users and primary groups and
> pam_group w/ /etc/security/group.conf for secondary groups like
> We actually considered restricting the games group to certain login
> times (i.e. after 18 pm ) to prevent our fellow students from gaming
> during office hours, but that just lead to long time sessions
> over-night. Since group memberships are evaluated on session creation.
Yes, that's essentially what I was thinking would be the most likely
scenario. Still, as marienz pointed out, having workstations where access to
games is undesired, yet where they're installed nevertheless, isn't the most
I'm in favor of the games group (per the second half of my last message and
for other reasons), just not extra unnecessary installation steps that
complicate the directory structure unless there's some real benefit to someone
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)