List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:22:09 +0100
Christian Ruppert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "NEW" will become "CONFIRMED"
> "REOPENED" will become "CONFIRMED" (and the "REOPENED" status will
> be removed)
I'd say, both to UNCONFIRMED. Before, we used to set 'NEW' for newly-
added bugs and didn't use UNCONFIRMED often. Right now, it seems
logical to use UNCONFIRMED for the new bugs and let devs (re-)confirm
them as necessary.
I think it might be even a good idea to limit the possibility
of setting 'CONFIRMED' to devs. Otherwise, I see users bumping each
of their bugs to 'CONFIRMED' immediately.
> We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for
> bugs.gentoo.org. So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to
> keep the old?
New one. Simpler is better.