Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:28:56
Message-Id: CAGfcS_k+ABLfEEK_150S_znc7Pvf6Q1ATakoLa-n4oEsbMLA+Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
2 <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
3 > I would like to avoid the situation that we all file stable requests like mad and end up with all-but-one swamped arch teams and a neverending list of open stabilization bugs waiting for the last arch.
4
5 I think that this is something worth trying to mitigate in some way
6 (maybe only file them for the archs that wish to participate).
7 However, I don't think we want the stable x86/amd64 experience to be
8 dictated primarily by the size of the smallest minor arch team (among
9 those we stabilize).
10
11 Rich