Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:50:48
Message-Id: 200409200350.48701.luke-jr@utopios.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Monday 20 September 2004 12:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:03:59 +0000 Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> wrote:
3 > | Exactly. For a *system administrator* to *temporarily* mount a
4 > | filesystem in. This means 'mount some-temp-filesystem /mnt'
5 > | temporarily, not 'mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom; mount /dev/fd0
6 > | /mnt/floppy; etc' perminantly.--
7 >
8 > Why have a specific toplevel for that? No need, just use cwd or $HOME.
9 > Surely you don't think the FHS is thaaaaat silly?
10
11 If the LSB can be silly enough to require RPM, why can't the FHS be silly
12 enough to require a silly toplevel?
13
14 > By 'temporary' they've gotta mean 'not always mounted'.
15
16 And they do... However, the mount point is /mnt, not /mnt/*
17 Also, on many systems, /mnt/cdrom etc *are* always mounted ... as
18 supermount. :)
19
20 > Anything else is madness.
21 No comment.
22 --
23 Luke-Jr
24 Developer, Utopios
25 http://utopios.org/