Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:03:12
Message-Id: 4D89EF29.1060906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review by James Cloos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Dne 23.3.2011 13:28, James Cloos napsal(a):
5 >>>>>> "MF" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes:
6 >
7 > MF> ideally, the git eclass should be creating bare checkouts only in its
8 > MF> store dir, in which case it could use `git archive | tar` to move
9 > MF> things over ...
10 >
11 > Or better yet, git clone.
12 >
13 > Most builds from vcs work best when they know that they are building
14 > from vcs.
15 >
16 > -JimC
17 I explained multiple times already why bare checkouts are not working in
18 our case.
19 I don't get why you guys keep repeating it like in the loop.
20 (I also asked for some implementation where the bare would be possible
21 with submodules stored in distdir, yet nobody said it is possible)
22
23 So live with it.
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
26 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
27
28 iEYEARECAAYFAk2J7ygACgkQHB6c3gNBRYdVMACfUPxairvFmsCM+gHTODS1EhTM
29 W0MAoKhDAnzkuOV0HUHfrBUmcY+nPli7
30 =WVty
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>